Distributed Computing Task Force: "Files" Working Group" 11/1/95 Meeting
Agenda
A little history...
Current ISC strategies...
Why bother?
Considerations for the future...
Current ISC strategies
PennNet
(via DCCS maintained file servers):
TCP/IP (ftp.upenn.edu)
Network Applications for Macs and PCs
Files (some documentation)
Access Method
Authenticated FTP (PennNet ID/Passwored)
anonymous FTP (anonymous/email address)
AppleTalk
(Penn_Software):
Network Applications with helper apps.
Access Method:
Zone: UPENN-ISC-DCCS Server: Penn_Software User: Penn Password: Penn Volume: Penn_Software
IPX (in planning - pending completion of IPX routing)
SneakerNet
(via CRC distributed diskettes):
MacOS:
PPP for Macintosh (1 disk)
MacSLIP v3.02 (w PPP support)
MacTCP v2.06
Network Applications Installer (1 disk)
Fetch v2.1.2
NCSA Telnet v2.7b4
Netscape v1.12 with helper appls (Stuffit Expander, Sound Machine)
AppleTalk patches
Windows v3.x:
PPP for Windows (3 disks)
Custom Installer utility
Netscape
Novell's TCPIP stack
Novell's Dialer
Novell's Host Presenter
Novell's PPP driver
"EUSI" (1 disk)
Novell's TCPIP stack
Novell's Host Presenter
Various ethernet ODI drivers
Custom Installer utility (allows downloading of)
Netscape (with helper apps)
WS_FTP
WS_FTPD
McGill's TN3270
Trumpet for Windows
Agreements exist with other Schools to redistribute ISC disks
Medical School (ISC diskettes plus their own)
Wharton (ISC diskettes plus their own)
Why bother?
Reduce redundant work creating installers and strategies
Promote campus-wide standards
Ensure quality of products distributed and media integrity
Minimize license and support costs
Minimize end-user and local provider of support configuration time
Technology needs to help people do their work, not be a hindrance (standards can help this perhaps)
Considerations for the Future: Need to explore methodology and philosophy...
What software should we install?
What tool(s) should we use?
How should the installer(s) and the applications be documented?
What kind of support should be offered to end-users or local support providers?
Who owns the "packages"? What is the governance and who has authority? Who can use them?
Nitty-gritty:
Do we need standard naming conventions?
What authentication method should we use?
What should we do about default preferences?
What protocols should we support?
Additional issues:
Initial versus upgrade installations
"Boot strap" concept
Can this project be successful at all without "control" over desk top configurations?
Please send questions and comments to
Noam H. Arzt
, Director, Information Technology Architecture, arzt@isc.upenn.edu
[The last revision of this document was on 7 November 1995]