Group A: Workshops on Leading Class
Leading Discussions in the Humanities and Qualitative Social Sciences
Participants will experience a hands-on introduction to leading discussions in humanities and qualitative social science fields, including useful methods and formats for engaging students and some common challenges to leading a productive discussion. This workshop is most appropriate for TAs in fields such as comparative literature, history, political science, EALC, NELC, and Africana studies. It is also appropriate for some TAs in Anthropology, Annenberg, and Management.
Leading Discussions in the Sciences and Quantitative Social Sciences
This workshop is most appropriate for TAs who will be using discussion to review lecture material or to give students experience reading journal articles and interpreting scientific data. This workshop is often most useful for students in Neuroscience, Psychology and Nursing and for some students in Earth and Environmental Science.
Leading Problem Solving Sessions in the Sciences, Quantitative Social Sciences and Engineering
This workshop will discuss recitations and other types of sessions (including exam review and office hours) that focus on homework and problem sets. The discussion will focus on strategies for getting students to think about and solve problems on their own as well as ways to incorporate course content into these sessions. This session is most appropriate for TAs in Economics and Linguistics and also for some students in Physics, Chemistry and Engineering.
Being An Effective Lab TA in the Sciences and Engineering
This workshop will prepare TAs to guide and interact with undergraduates in labs. Participants will discuss how to help students learn from lab and how to use labs to engage with course material. This workshop is for students who are teaching labs in Physics, Chemistry, Earth and Environmental Science and in Engineering.
Group B – Grading
Grading in the Humanities and Qualitative Social Sciences
This workshop offers a variety of strategies for constructing fair, efficient criteria for grading undergraduate papers and essay exams. In particular it will focus on creating a set of standards for evaluating undergraduate work.
Grading in the Sciences, Quantitative Social Sciences and Engineering
This workshop will allow participants to develop ways to grade work efficiently and fairly, particularly focusing on strategies for assigning partial credit for problem sets, short answer essays and projects.
Group C – Issues You May Face as a TA (Scenarios)
Humanities and Qualitative Social Sciences
These scenarios focus on concerns that TAs face in humanities and some social science courses where students are expected to do a good bit of reading and writing and much of the work in recitation is discussion-based.
Quantitative Social Sciences
These scenarios focus on concerns that TAs face in social science courses where students are expected to use numbers to think through social issues (especially in fields like Economics) and where the work in recitation is focused on problem solving.
These scenarios focus on concerns that TAs face in science courses where students are expected to understand scientific concepts as well as develop problem solving skills. Recitations and labs for these courses combine problems, one-on-one work with students and discussion.
These scenarios focus on issues that TAs in engineering face, focusing on the sort of preprofessional and project-based issues that are important in the Engineering school