Previous Gazetteer item | Next
Gazetteer item | Jan/Feb Contents | Gazette
home
FORUM
What Should I Wear?
Queen
Marie Antoinette of France—known
for her extravagance and her lack of sensitivity towards the masses—wore
a “saintly” white gown to her execution, said Dr. Caroline Weber, assistant
professor of Romance languages. The queen had smuggled it into prison
for the occasion.
Weber,
a specialist in late-18th-century French literature and culture, was one
of the speakers at the Penn Humanities Forum lecture, “Style and the Fashioning
of the Body,” in September. And fashion, she argued, was at the forefront
of the French queen’s scandals.
The
queen used her intricate, expensive hairdos and off-kilter clothing to
attempt public statements, Weber noted. When she refused to wear a corset
upon her arrival at Versailles, her mother, Austrian Empress Maria Theresa,
wrote letters urging her to come to her senses, as well as to stop “riding
like a man would” on horses. Both actions, the empress feared, would prevent
the young queen from conceiving an heir for Louis XVI.
“The
power of her fashion was to do too much and too little,” Weber said, noting
that the queen’s style statements failed her in the end. “The happy myth
of purity” she tried to create at the guillotine couldn’t save her neck.
Today,
her wild legacy appears in modern fashions, as Weber demonstrated during
her slide presentation. One slide showed a brightly colored “Marie Antoinette”
designer hoop dress by John Galliano, complete with a cartoon-like Jacobin
wielding an embroidered guillotine. Another slide showed Madonna, vogueing
and striking a pose in “an interesting late-20th-century model of what
Marie Antoinette was wearing.”
In
recent years, fashion—and its social and political impact—has become a
fertile field for scholars, aided by such phenomena as mail-order shopping
and televised fashion commentaries. According to Dr. Diana Crane, professor
of sociology and author of the new book Fashion and Its Social Agendas:
Class, Gender, and Identity in Clothing, alternative styles are now
emerging from subgroups within the masses. In the sixties and seventies,
it was the hippies and punks, said Crane, who noted that popular music
continues to spawn new fads. As a result, European designers are no longer
the unchallenged fashion fascists.
Crane,
who interviewed fashion designers and industry writers for her book, said
that the current goal for designers is not so much fashions as “tendencies.”
Detecting trends can be a tricky business, though, since a shawl may be
all the rage one day and passČ the next. It’s also becoming more costly
to break into the business. Many of the designers Crane interviewed soon
flopped, suffering from a paucity of capital and expertise. But some designers
develop “cult followings,” she said, noting that televised product-placements
by celebrities infuse brand names and chosen styles with cash and cachet.
Dr.
Peter Stallybrass, professor of English, noted that from an early age,
the desire to express oneself through clothing can take the form of a
struggle, one that begins in childhood. “The battle is between clothing
oneself and being clothed,” said Stallybrass, who has examined
the relationship between clothing and identity.
He
offered the example of Harriet Jacobs, the 19th-century African-American
woman who escaped from slavery and later wrote Incidents in the Life
of a Slave Girl. In that book, Jacobs recounted how she had “hated”
the “linsey-woolsey” dress she was forced to wear, describing it as “one
of the badges of slavery.” After she escaped, an advertisement for her
capture noted that she was a good seamstress and “will probably appear,
if abroad, tricked out in gay and fashionable finery.”
Fashion,
said Stallybrass, “was one of the badges of her freedom.”
—Aliya Sternstein C’02
Previous Gazetteer item | Next Gazetteer item | Jan/Feb Contents | Gazette home
Copyright 2001 The Pennsylvania
Gazette Last modified 1/2/01