|
|
At the end of March, when jazz vocalist and alumni volunteer Lolita Jackson EAS89 serenaded Dr. Judith Rodin CW66 at a gala at Manhattans Gotham Hall to celebrate her tenure as Penn president, the song chosen for this tribute was Youre the Top. Earlier, in introducing Rodin, Penn trustee Leonard Lauder W54 had proclaimed her Penns greatest presidentto which the crowd of about 1,000 New York alumni responded with a roar of approval.
These are just two examples of what Rodin gratefully calls the tremendous reservoir of good will she has experienced since she announced that she would step down from Penns presidency as of June 30, 2004. Given the demands on anyone running a major university, some measure of appreciation would surely be appropriate, but the intensity and enthusiasm of Rodins well-wishers at those events and in Washington (on April 20, after the Gazette went to press), as well as in dozens of other venues large and small in recent months, speak to a broad awareness that the past 10 years have been extraordinarily good and important ones for Pennand that Rodins leadership has been essential to the Universitys advances during this period. Many of those advances can be quantified, in buildings built and renovated, major programs and research institutes launched, top-quality faculty and staff hired and retained, selectivity in admissions increased, neighborhood fences mended and new relationships forgednot to mention money raised to pay for it all. But as important, Rodinthe first woman president in the Ivy Leaguebrought a new spirit and energy to College Hall and the task of raising Penn to the next level. Among her numerous other activities, she has been a tireless cheerleader for Penn, with a savvy sense of how to get the word out about the University. Her administration has not been free of criticismmuch of it revolving around a leadership style that some felt was too corporateand has also confronted several significant challenges along the way. One was a sharp rise in crime in the Fall of 1996, of which more below. Another was the death of research subject Jesse Gelsinger in a gene-therapy trial, which prompted FDA sanctions against Penns Institute for Human Gene Therapy and its director, Dr. James Wilson, and a reexamination of protocols for informed-consent in research trials. And the accidental death of alumnus Michael Tobin C94 at a fraternity party led to changes in the Universitys campus policies on alcohol. Lawsuits against the University were filed by the families in both of those cases, and were ultimately settled out of court. On the business side, a 1997 decision to outsource facilities-management functions, touted as a model for the future, was later reversed in large part. Perhaps the gravest threat, in terms of its potential impact on the institution, was a financial crisis at the Universitys Health System, which a few years ago had amassed more than $300 million in deficits, leading to the ouster of Dr. William Kelley, then CEO of the Health System and dean of the medical school. Those losses have been reversed, and the system is currently profitable. After considering setting up a separate not-for-profit entity, the University created Penn Medicine, a new, unified governing board for the Health System and medical school that reports to Penns board of trustees [Gazetteer, January/February 2002]. Moodys Investors Service recently upgraded Penns long-term rating, commenting favorably on the Universitys integrated strategic and financial planning. And as Rodin prepares to depart College Hall, Penn is engaged in a simmering dispute with some of its graduate students over their right to unionize. However, virtually all observers concede the effectiveness of her administration in responding to these challenges and its determination to reach the ambitious goals set out for the University almost from the day she took office. As early as her inauguration, as the president herself notes in the interview that follows and in her farewell From College Hall column, the critical elements of her vision for Penn were present. Following extensive discussions among the Universitys schools, centers, and other constituencies, these priorities were elaborated and codified in The Agenda for Excellence, the Universitys strategic plan for 1995-2000. And, unlike many similar plans, they were largely carried out. Not that Penn can ever rest on its laurels. In her interview with the Gazette, the president emphasized that universities must continually reinvent themselves or go stale, warning: Thats whats happened to many of our peers, and thats why we were able to surpass many of them. Below, we take a look at the Rodin-era reinvention and some of the ways it has changed Penn. page > > >
|
FEATURE:
page > > >
|