In September, the University of Pennsylvania Press published Public Discourse in America: Conversation and Community in the Twenty-First Century, coedited by Penn President Judith Rodin and Stephen Steinberg, executive director of the Penn National Commission on Society, Culture, and Community.
The volume collects essays written for six meetings of the Commission that was convened by Rodin in 1996 to create a robust and diverse public culture in which reasoned and reasonable discourse can flourish. At the time, few issues loomed larger than the apparently rapid deterioration of public discourse and public behavior in the United States, Rodin writes in a prologue.
The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 have rendered that era far more distant in mind that it is in years. But the problems addressed by the essays, say the coeditors, are in some ways perennial and more specifically go back to the early 20th century, as thick interdependencies between social life and politics have given way to a thinning of public discourse, in which politics is estranged from peoples lives, values, and social experiences.
Those problems also seem likely to outlast the mood of national unity that immediately followed the terrorist attacks, as arguments over foreign wars and their aftermaths in Afghanistan and Iraq, and over alleged challenges to civil liberties at homenot to mention the looming presidential elections of 2004have dissipated some of that common sense of purpose. While seemingly more civil and unified, Americas current domestic and international situation makes the three-year study undertaken by the Penn National Commission on Society, Culture and Community in the late 1990s far more relevant than one might first have thought, they contend.
Nearly 50 academic and professional leaders participated in the meetings, held in Philadelphia, Chicago, Washington, and Los Angeles between 1996 and 1999. The essays are organized around six major areas, moving from an examination of public discourse and democracy, to the challenge of talking about racea tragic and recurrent failure in American public lifeto studies in contemporary discourse leadership, to discourses of reconciliation, to principles and practices for thickening public discourse, and finally to ways to create community through public discourse.
Contributors include the essayist Richard Rodriguez on the increasingly convoluted question of racial identity in America; Harvard University president emeritus Derek Bok on political leadership in the healthcare debate of 1993-94; movie and cultural critic Neal Gabler on public discourse in popular culture; Jay Rosen, a leader in the public journalism movement, on journalism as civic leadership; and University of Chicago president Don Randel on the myth of academic community. Besides the prologue, Rodin contributes an essay on the university as discourse community (excerpted here), and co-editor Steinberg writes on creating communities in cyberspace and an epilogue on the centrality of public discourse.
Throughout the course of its work, the Commission struggled against a shorthand view of its mission as one of merely getting peoplepoliticians and the rest of usto be more civil, nicer to each other. Rodin uses an anecdote about (who else?) Benjamin Franklin to clarify the Commissions true goaland, historically, the United States salvation in times of crisis.
In 1787, Franklin admonished the Continental Congress that they had
come together to consult, not to contend, with each other, Rodin
writes. But we know that they did contend with each other, sometimes
strongly and uncivilly, about the most fundamental conceptions of
human liberty, community, and
page > >