Just what we needed: something else to worry about. Weapons of mass destruction, global warming, collapsing currencies around the world -- all of that is old hat at the end of the century of the electronic mass media. So now we have the Y2K computer bug. In its most extreme form, this gets us nothing less than the collapse of civilization as we know it.
A couple of things are important to remember:
The only real problems we face this year lie in the hardware and software of computer systems.
Every vaguely attentive citizen knows about two-digit year codes in software and in embedded chips that control mechanical systems.
There is no question that these systems require repair and upgrade. So weve spent time fixing them.
Can there be catastrophic failures if not all systems are fixed properly? Of course. Will there be some? Perhaps, but if there are, I anticipate they will be few and limited in their scope.
So, OK, Im an expert and I say reassuring things. Is that enough? Well, I might be wrong. The likelihood that I am very wrong is not great.
But more important, our economy is driven by advertisers and media who want our attention, and the two sure-fire ways to get our attention are to titillate us or to scare us. And Y2K is a perfect opportunity to scare people.
And that leads us to what I am afraid of: people who are afraid.
Franklin Roosevelt had the same fear in 1933, and we should listen to him. Fear can debilitate, and fear, most of all, can make people irrational.
In 1974, we faced shortages of fuel and beef -- it was the talk of the nation. So Johnny Carson comes out one night and reads the joke his writers have written -- Why, its gotten so bad, theres even a toilet paper shortage!
The supply of toilet paper was exactly what it should have been. But people were afraid there might be a shortage, so they bought a few more rolls than they needed. Their friends saw them do that and did likewise. In no time at all there was a shortage.
So how does an intelligent and responsible person react to all this? By keeping three things in mind:
The best hope for mankind entering the 21st century is to prove that we can face a fundamentally limited and modest challenge like this with calm and reason, seeing in it an opportunity to make community, not head for the hills. But some people will head for the hills and devote themselves to scaring their neighbors into acts of irrationality that will cause harm.
Think of it as a referendum on civilization. Have we achieved it? Im casting a yes vote.
Still bugged by Y2K? See Millennium countdown.
James J. ODonnell, Ph.D., is professor of classical studies and vice provost for information systems and computing.
Originally published on September 16, 1999